The Application Of Collective Intelligence In Risk Management

By Charles Wright


The reason why risk managers are employed is so that they can ensure an entity is safe from any adverse occurrences. That is why in this writing the application of collective intelligence in managing risk will be looked at exhaustively. The problem is that some of these managers are not given the right information, tools, and knowledge so that they can deal with some of the potential risks the right way. Most of them will be fed with information regarding something that went wrong in the past other than focusing on what the future holds.

The analysis here will be about the type of intelligence that such administrators need so that they can effectively conduct their work. The first type has to do with the organization where data on processes structure, cultures and technology is conveyed. Such data will be sourced from people at a higher level than they are in the company by conducting interviews and taking a look at some of the procedures of operation that are used.

The other type has to do with commercial activities and how they take place. It goes further to identify the competition that the business is facing and how to counter it. The people supplying you will use various products and the ones that come to purchase them are also considered.

You will also come across the type that deals with technicalities such as the law, various methodologies that are used and the tools that are required to use. As such, any manager will know how to go about their activities while putting this information into use.

For the application of such intelligence to be a success, everyone at the company must be focused towards achieving the same purpose. The trick used is in placing all their grievances and other suggestions on an online platform where others will come to have a look and then proceed to have an intranet discussion. When the sessions are ongoing, that is when ideas will be brought up on how to handle some problem.

Some firms may be burden by schooling their employees so as to know how to handle issues, but that is not the case here. Everyone is given an equal ground where they can present their grievances, and they will be heard. The company gets to save a lot because the time is taken to get systems running and the money that will be spent on the same is way less.

Whereas most organizations rely on whistle-blowing, it is usually followed by a lot of critical repercussions. That is why open communication is supported because many people will get to tell it the way it is without having to fear. The risk of getting exposed will make many employees avoid practices such as theft and other unethical behaviors.

It is the approach that will fulfill all the psychological needs that an employee has to make them feel content at work. It is all about making the employees feel wanted and part of the business when they are consulted on critical issues.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment